categories :: Markup-Test :: all

Markup-Test

link to this article

Markup-Test

Testpage

2008-06-10


Typesetting

Emphasized Text.

\SMALL, \Small, \small

\big, \Big, \BIG

\center



top to the very bottom

You can see in [0] and on ompf [1] that the truth is not necessarily out there 0



Images

Images of picogen (\alpha^{\frac{\omega}{\gamma}}). Fortunatley, thumbnails are automagically generated by invocation of some magick 3.

http://phresnel.org/./gen-image/Markup-Test/markup-test-images/picogen_0002.jpg

http://phresnel.org/./gen-image/Markup-Test/markup-test-images/zbncubemap.pnghttp://phresnel.org/./gen-image/Markup-Test/markup-test-images/sys-evac.png

http://phresnel.org/./gen-image/Markup-Test/markup-test-images/picogen_0009.png



LaTeX-formulas

Let x=3^3, then x=8+\pi, with \pi=1, so that

x=8+\pi=9=3^3

.

Using math-symbols en masse in prime-time-television makes that appearance no way better. Take for example: 4

\pi^{x^y}=\frac{1}{\sum^3_x n_x \cdot \alpha^\phi}

. Doesn't that look astonishing? No. It does not.

Don't forget that you can click the formulas to get a bigger and printable version 5.



Verbatim

It follows a part 6 of source markup that has been used to generate this site:


\date{2008-06-10}
\title{Testpage}
\category{Markup-Test}
\class{markup-test}
\maketitle{true}


\section {Typesetting}{
\emph{Emphasized Text.}

\SMALL{\\SMALL}, \Small{\\Small}, \small{\\small}

\big{\\big}, \Big{\\Big}, \BIG{\\BIG}

\center{\\center}

\Big{\sup{\sup{top} to} the \sub{very \sub{bottom}}}

You can see in \reference{Preetham: A Practical Analytical Model ...} and on ompf
\ref{\url{http://ompf.org/forum}, the ompf.org forum} that the truth
is not necessarily out there \footnote{You don't have to believe that it is not possible
to have ... \footnote{... footnodes inside other ... \footnote{... footnotes.
proof: \display-math{\pi = 2.9^{\phi\delta x}}. See? Madness.}}}
}

\section {Images}{
Images of picogen (\math{\alpha^{\frac{\omega}{\gamma}}}).
Fortunatley, thumbnails are automagically generated by invocation of some magick
\footnote{\image{markup-test-images/49278848.png}}.

\center{
\image-s{416}{markup-test-images/picogen_0002.jpg}

\image-s{196}{markup-test-images/zbncubemap.png}
\image-s{196}{markup-test-images/sys-evac.png}

\image-s{416}{markup-test-images/picogen_0009.png}
}
}

\section {LaTeX-formulas}{
Let \math{x=3^3}, then \math{x=8+\pi}, with \math{\pi=1}, so that
\display-math{x=8+\pi=9=3^3}.


Using math-symbols en masse in prime-time-television makes that appearance no way better.
Take for example:
\footnote{
That is because
\display-math{\pi^{x^y}=\frac{1}{\sum^3_x n_x \cdot \alpha^\phi}}
really is without any sense.
}
\display-math{\pi^{x^y}=\frac{1}{\sum^3_x n_x \cdot \alpha^\phi}}.
Doesn't that look astonishing? No. It does not.

\emph{\big{Don't forget that you can click the formulas to get a bigger and printable version
\footnote{I will write a full PDF exporter soon}.}}
}

\section {Verbatim} {
\emph{
It follows a part \footnote{This article is not a quine
\reference{\url{http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quine_(computing)}}}
of source markup that has been used to generate this site:
}
\code{
Not a quine!
}
}

footnotes

0:You don't have to believe that it is not possible to have ... 1
1:... footnodes inside other ... 2
2:... footnotes. proof:

\pi = 2.9^{\phi\delta x}

. See? Madness.

3:http://phresnel.org/./gen-image/Markup-Test/markup-test-images/49278848.png
4: That is because

\pi^{x^y}=\frac{1}{\sum^3_x n_x \cdot \alpha^\phi}

really is without any sense.

5:I will write a full PDF exporter soon
6:This article is not a quine[2]

references

0:Preetham: A Practical Analytical Model ...
1:http://ompf.org/forum, the ompf.org forum
2:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quine_(computing)

top